Applying Open
Source AI:
Building a Service
with Llama
A Step-by-Step Guide to Developing AI-Driven Services Using FULLY AI and Open Source Technologies
A paper by FULLY AI.
Author: Niklas von Weihe (CTO & Co-Founder)
1. Introduction
In the rapidly evolving landscape of digital services, integrating AI technologies has become a cornerstone for innovation across industries. As organizations seek to enhance efficiency, accessibility, and user experience, deploying AI-driven solutions is not just an option but a necessity. Large language models (LLMs) like Meta’s Llama 3 family, which now includes the updated Llama 3.3 alongside Llama 3.1 and Llama 3.2, have emerged as powerful tools offering advanced capabilities in natural language processing (NLP), multilingual support, contextual understanding, and, with select models, vision-enabled functionalities.
FULLY AI, co-founded by Minh Dao and Niklas von Weihe, has partnered closely with Meta to leverage Llama models for developing AI solutions in various sectors, including government. For entities with stringent compliance needs, such as government bodies and regulated industries, these models provide not only powerful AI capabilities but also unique advantages in terms of data sovereignty—the complete control over data processing and storage. By allowing organizations to host models on their own infrastructure or on certified government clouds, Llama models support autonomy and compliance in data-sensitive applications.
This guide is designed for business executives exploring AI-driven solutions, government officials aiming to enhance public services, and technical professionals, including system integrators and developers, who are implementing these models.
Developed by FULLY AI in collaboration with Meta, it provides a step-by-step approach to leveraging AI-driven services using open-source technologies, with a special emphasis on real-world applications. Through examples like a citizen-centric service portal, we demonstrate how the Llama 3 family can transform service delivery to be more inclusive and efficient. By combining technical guidance with practical case studies, this guide equips organizations to deploy Llama models effectively, ensuring they meet high standards of security, compliance, and performance while achieving tangible impacts in their sectors.
Through this guide, we explore the important stages of AI implementation—from strategic planning and model selection to deployment and ongoing maintenance—while emphasizing the unique advantages of using open-source technologies. Whether you are in the public sector, education, finance, or any industry that relies on digital services, this guide offers valuable insights into how Llama models can be tailored to meet your specific needs.
As you embark on this journey, our goal is to provide not just a technical manual, but a strategic roadmap that highlights the potential of AI in driving the future of service delivery. By adopting the methodologies and best practices outlined here, your organization can harness the power of AI to deliver better, more accessible services to your users while staying ahead in an increasingly digital world.
2. Why choose Open Source AI?
Understanding the role of OS AI in the realm of LLMs is helpful to appreciating its transformative potential. In this section, we explore the advantages and challenges of open source.
2.1 Essential Benefits of Open Source AI
2.1.1 Privacy, Security & Compliance
One of the most compelling advantages of open-source models, like Llama, is the control they offer over data management, particularly when self-hosted. Self-hosting ensures that sensitive data, especially in sectors like healthcare, finance, and government services, remains fully under your control. This autonomy is ideal for meeting stringent compliance standards such as GDPR, ISO 27001, NIS 2, HIPAA, or government-level compliance like BSI for maintaining transparency and trust.
Additionally, a key differentiator of open-source models like Llama is the ability to achieve data sovereignty, where organizations retain full control over data storage and processing. This level of autonomy is particularly appealing for sectors that need to comply with strict regulations. By hosting models on local servers, agencies can exercise complete control over the data processing environment, which is often required to meet sector-specific regulations and provide transparency in handling sensitive information.
To further enhance security, Llama open source safety tooling align with the OWASP GenAI Top 10 guidelines, a set of security best practices for Generative AI applications. These guidelines, developed by OWASP, include essential security controls addressing risks such as data leakage, prompt injection, model misuse, and privacy vulnerabilities.
Llama open source safety tooling includes system-level safeguards like Prompt Guard and Llama Guard, which protect against malicious prompts and monitor outputs for potential threats, ensuring that the model remains secure and compliant in sensitive environments.1
However, it is important to note that cloud hosting and API providers also offer robust privacy and security measures. While these solutions might not provide the same level of data autonomy as self-hosting, they can still meet high compliance standards like GDPR or ISO depending on the provider’s certifications and infrastructure. The key difference lies in the degree of control and responsibility over the data: self-hosting offers full autonomy, whereas using third-party providers requires trust in their security protocols.
2.1.2 Flexibility, Fine-Tuning and Hosting Options
Llama’s open-source model family offers a unique advantage in deployment flexibility. With new capabilities for on-device processing, the Llama models can run directly on mobile or low-power devices, making them suitable for applications where data privacy is critical and latency must be minimized. This flexibility supports both decentralized (edge) computing and traditional cloud hosting, allowing organizations to tailor deployment based on their specific needs and compliance requirements. Llama is supported by an extensive network of computing partners and cloud providers, including AMD, AWS, Databricks, Dell, Google Cloud, IBM Oracle Cloud and more, ensuring that scalable, secure hosting options are available for any model size.2
Llama’s open-source nature enables both fine-tuning and model distillation to meet specific industry needs. Fine-tuning allows organizations to adapt a pre-trained model to their particular domain by training it on specialized data, improving accuracy for tasks within that field. For those seeking efficiency without sacrificing performance, model distillation offers a way to create a smaller, resource-friendly version of a larger model, ideal for deployment in resource-constrained environments. Additionally, open-source access has allowed hardware partners like Groq to develop optimized chips specifically tailored to enhance Llama’s performance in high-throughput applications, providing adaptable and efficient hardware setups unique to open-source models.3
2.1.3 Open-Source Community
The collaborative nature of open-source software creates rapid innovation and continuous improvement. One of the greatest advantages of working with open-source models is the community that actively shares fine-tuned models, saving time, money, and expertise. Unlike proprietary models, which often require significant internal resources for customization, open-source models benefit from an ecosystem where you can find ready-to-use models that meet specific needs.
For example, Neuromagic’s optimized version of the Llama 405B model on Hugging Face reduces GPU requirements by 50%, making high-performance AI more accessible and cost-effective.4 The community’s contributions also extend to innovative optimizations, such as NVIDIA’s fine-tuning of the 70B Llama model, which has achieved performance levels surpassing some proprietary models like GPT-4o.5 Additionally, Llama’s quantized lightweight models have been developed to enable deployment on mobile and low-power devices, showcasing the versatility of open-source LLMs in meeting diverse application needs.6
For more information, the Llama Community Support and Resources page provides valuable resources for developers, offering ongoing support for fine-tuning, deployment, and compliance.
This vibrant ecosystem is a unique benefit of open-source models, offering practical solutions and technical advancements that are simply unavailable with proprietary models.7
2.1.4 Cost Control and Scalability
Open-source models offer significant potential for cost savings, though the extent of these savings depends heavily on the chosen hosting strategy. Self-hosting can be extremely cost-effective, as it limits expenses to operational costs associated with running the hardware. This approach also provides predictability in budgeting, as you control the infrastructure.
For larger models or more scalable solutions, cloud hosting and API providers offer flexibility with pay-as-you-go pricing, which can be ideal for businesses needing to manage fluctuating workloads. While cloud hosting might incur higher ongoing costs, it eliminates the need for substantial upfront investments in hardware and allows for easier scaling. Ultimately, open-source enables organizations to choose the most cost-effective hosting solution tailored to their specific needs.
This vibrant ecosystem is a unique benefit of open-source models, offering practical solutions and technical advancements that are simply unavailable with proprietary models.
2.1.4 Cost Control and Scalability
Open-source models offer significant potential for cost savings, though the extent of these savings depends heavily on the chosen hosting strategy. Self-hosting can be extremely cost-effective, as it limits expenses to operational costs associated with running the hardware. This approach also provides predictability in budgeting, as you control the infrastructure.
For larger models or more scalable solutions, cloud hosting and API providers offer flexibility with pay-as-you-go pricing, which can be ideal for businesses needing to manage fluctuating workloads. While cloud hosting might incur higher ongoing costs, it eliminates the need for substantial upfront investments in hardware and allows for easier scaling. Ultimately, open-source enables organizations to choose the most cost-effective hosting solution tailored to their specific needs.
2.2 Considerations for using Open Source
2.2.1 Security and Quality Assurance
While open-source models offer numerous benefits, they come with specific challenges related to security and quality assurance. Since the code is openly available, it could potentially expose vulnerabilities that malicious actors might exploit. However, this openness is also a strength; with more eyes on the code, security flaws can be identified and patched more quickly than in proprietary models. In the long run, open-source models may evolve into more secure options due to this continuous community-driven examination.
For users concerned about quality assurance, tools like Llama Guard 3 and implementing a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) system can help ensure the integrity and reliability of the model’s outputs. These tools are compatible with the Llama 3 family, including both text-only and vision-enabled models, which is beneficial for organizations deploying complex, multimodal applications. While these measures may require some effort to implement, developers can customize them to their specific content policy, helping ensure their applications operate safely and effectively over time.8
2.2.2 Licensing
Managing licensing and ongoing maintenance for open-source models requires some diligence, but it is generally straightforward. One of the main challenges with open-source software is ensuring compliance with the various licenses, as well as tracking updates and applying patches in a timely manner.
Unlike proprietary models, where licensing is often bundled with usage costs, open-source licenses require active management to avoid legal and operational risks. However, the transparency and predictability of these licenses provide a clear framework for compliance.
To address these challenges, free open source tools like Dependabot can automatically track and update licenses, making the process seamless and efficient. By automating the tracking of licensing obligations and ensuring timely updates, organizations can mitigate the risks associated with non-compliance. Dependabot and similar tools help simplify the process, allowing teams to focus on development while maintaining adherence to open-source licensing requirements.
As an example, the Llama 3.2 Acceptable Use Policy outlines key considerations for organizations implementing this model. The policy specifies allowed and prohibited uses, emphasizing responsible deployment and prohibiting activities such as misuse for harmful or unlawful purposes. For organizations adopting Llama 3.2, understanding and adhering to these guidelines is essential to ensure compliance with both legal and ethical standards. More details can be found on the Llama 3.2 acceptable use policy page.9
2.2.3 Meta’s Role in Balancing Disadvantages
Meta’s involvement in the development and support of open-source models, such as Llama 3 family, aims to address some of the common challenges associated with open-source software. By providing continuous quality assurance, documentation, and clear licensing terms, this approach contributes to the reliability and security of these models. Additionally, this support fosters a larger developer community, facilitating ongoing innovation.
For organizations, this effort means that adopting Llama models, including those optimized for on-device use and high-performance vision applications, comes with the benefit of enhanced stability, security, and community support. This backing helps reduce the typical risks associated with using open-source software, making Llama a viable option for projects that need the flexibility of open-source along with the reassurance of consistent and dependable support.10
2.3 Environmental Impact of Open-Source LLMs
The environmental impact of large language models has become a key consideration for organizations adopting AI technologies. Meta’s Llama family highlights how open-source AI can contribute to sustainability by using energy-efficient infrastructure and renewable energy sources for training. While exact energy savings are model-dependent, recent studies suggest that optimizing training processes, as seen with open-source frameworks
like Llama, can significantly lower carbon emissions compared to proprietary models hosted exclusively in centralized data centers.11
Inference efficiency is another area where Llama models stand out. Smaller models such as the Llama 3.2 1B and 3B variants can operate locally on mobile devices or low-power hardware, reducing reliance on energy-intensive cloud services. This approach aligns with findings that deploying models on local infrastructure or edge devices can cut energy consumption by up to 90%, particularly for use cases requiring lightweight real-time processing, such as anonymizing data or simple natural language interactions.12
Llama’s modular architecture also supports fine-tuning and model distillation, allowing users to create task-specific versions optimized for their needs. This flexibility helps organizations strike a balance between performance and energy use, ensuring resource efficiency for both small-scale applications and larger deployments. Open-source frameworks like Llama thus offer an adaptable and scalable approach to AI adoption while addressing sustainability concerns across diverse industries.13
3. Llama Essentials: What You Should Know
3.1 Introduction to the
Llama Model Family
The Llama 3 model family, now expanded with the updated Llama 3.3 version, comprises a diverse range of models designed to address varying levels of complexity and computational requirements. Generally speaking, the larger the model in terms of parameters, the more advanced and capable it is in tackling complex tasks, providing higher quality outputs.
1B and 3B Models: Introduced with Llama 3.2, the 1B and 3B models are optimized for on-device processing, offering lightweight, low-computation solutions that can run directly on mobile devices or IoT systems.
These models are ideal for real-time applications where speed and privacy are crucial,
such as personalized mobile assistants or local data analysis tools in remote environments with limited connectivity.
8B Model: The 8B model, part of the Llama 3.1 family, is designed for tasks that require quick processing and are of moderate complexity. It excels in real-time data analysis, basic decision support systems, and content generation. Despite its smaller size, it is powerful enough to handle these tasks efficiently, making it an ideal choice for environments where speed is critical and resources may be limited. Its lightweight nature allows it to be run on local devices, making it highly accessible.
11B Vision Model: The Llama 3.2 update unveils the powerful 11B model, which not only matches the compact size of the Llama 3.1 8B model but also significantly elevates functionality with its advanced vision capabilities. This makes it suitable for applications that integrate both text and visual inputs, such as multimodal customer support systems that process both messages and images, enhancing user experience in customer-facing interactions.
70B Model: The Llama 3.3 70B model enhances multilingual dialogue capabilities, supporting eight languages like English, German, and French. With instruction tuning using supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF), it delivers nuanced, safe, and helpful responses.
Its 128k token context length and Grouped-Query Attention (GQA) enable efficient handling of complex tasks. Ideal for multilingual customer service, intelligent chatbots, and knowledge generation, the 70B model ensures a seamless balance of speed and quality across diverse applications.
90B Vision Model: The 90B model in Llama 3.2 takes a leap forward with its advanced vision, making it a powerful choice for multimodal applications that require text and image processing. It is especially useful for customer engagement platforms or high-quality content creation that involves both textual and visual components
405B Model: As the most advanced in the Llama 3 family, the 405B model (from Llama 3.1) is designed to tackle the most complex tasks with superior reasoning and understanding capabilities. It is best suited for applications that require deep comprehension and sophisticated decision-making, such as personalized tutoring systems, advanced legal document analysis, and strategic planning. This model’s complexity and power make it ideal for high-stakes scenarios where accuracy and depth of understanding are paramount.
The table below highlights the differences in model sizes, serving as a reference for informed decision-making which model to use.14
Table 1: Comparison of Llama 3 Model Variants15
* Note: The costs and speeds listed in this table are accurate as of December 6th, 2024.
Please note that these figures are subject to change as technology and market conditions evolve. We recommend checking for the latest data before making any decisions based on these metrics. Costs and Speed values represent the average across different providers.
3.2 What's new?
The Llama 3 family introduces several advanced features designed to enhance performance and applicability across various industries.
Strongly Improved Quality: Llama 3.1’s flagship 405B model demonstrates competitive performance to other flagship AI models, achieving an 88.6 MMLU score. While this score positions it as a leader among open-source models at the time of its release, recent advancements like Tencent’s Hunyuan-Large model (88.4 on MMLU) highlight the rapidly evolving landscape of open-source AI. MMLU measures how well an AI model can answer questions across a wide range of subjects, but it is one of many metrics used to evaluate overall model performance. Llama’s unique strengths in vision capabilities, multilingual support, and deployment flexibility remain critical differentiators.16
Expanded Model Options with Vision and On-Device Capabilities: With Llama 3.2 and 3.3, the family now includes models designed for specialized needs:
• Vision-Capable: The 11B and 90B models bring multimodal capabilities, allowing them to process both text and visual inputs for richer applications; not currently available in the European Union.
• On-Device: The 1B and 3B models are optimized for on-device processing, making it possible to run Llama’s powerful language processing locally on mobile or IoT devices.
This capability is particularly advantageous for applications requiring real-time response and privacy, as data can be processed directly on the device without relying on cloud resources.
Performance and Scalability: The updated 70B model delivers similar performance to the flagship 405B foundation model, but is simpler and more cost-effective to operate, making it ideal for enterprise workflow implementations.
Multilingualism: Llama family supports eight languages, including English, French, German, Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, Hindi, and Thai, broadening their usability across global contexts. With these languages spoken by over half of the world’s population, Llama’s multilingual capabilities extend its potential reach to a significant portion of users worldwide.
Large Context Window: The Llama model family features an extensive context window, capable of handling up to 128,000 tokens in a single session — roughly 393 pages of a standard textbook. This allows the model to process a large amount of input, including prompts, long documents, or ongoing conversations, without losing track of previous information. This capability is especially valuable for applications requiring coherent, contextually aware responses across complex, multi-step interactions, such as document analysis, customer service, or extended user interactions.
3.3 Vision and Multimodality: Expanding AI’s Scope with Llama
With the release of Llama 3.2, vision capabilities become integral to the model’s functionality, introducing a powerful multimodal feature that expands AI applications across industries. Llama 3.2’s 11B and 90B models now support both text and image inputs, allowing for comprehensive data interpretation and enriched analysis. This advancement enhances the model’s utility in fields that benefit from the integration of visual and textual data, positioning Llama 3.2 as a versatile tool for complex AI applications.]
Multimodality as a Transformative Feature
The addition of multimodal capabilities to the 11B and 90B models—enabling seamless image and text processing—marks a pivotal step in the evolution of the Llama model family. This functionality supports more advanced tasks, including interpreting visual content, extracting insights from document images, and performing detailed analyses that incorporate visual data.
Multimodality will likely drive future AI applications by uniting varied data sources, facilitating AI’s application in settings such as healthcare diagnostics, retail, and autonomous systems where combined text and image interpretation is essential.
Llama Guard Vision: Enhancing Safety in Multimodal
Use Cases
Llama 3.2 introduces Llama Guard Vision as a safeguard in multimodal interactions, acting as a safety classifier for both inputs and outputs. This tool flags inappropriate content, such as depictions of violence, privacy risks, or hate speech, reinforcing responsible usage of AI in image and text integrations. By filtering out harmful content, Llama Guard Vision ensures that Llama 3.2’s multimodal functionality can be applied in sensitive fields, including education, healthcare, and social media, without compromising on safety standards.
3.4 Navigating EU
Regulatory Uncertainty
Despite the transformative potential of Llama 3.2's multimodal capabilities, deployment in the EU is limited due to regulatory uncertainties around AI and data privacy. Recent interventions by European data protection authorities have created significant uncertainty around what types of data can be used to train AI models.
European companies and AI industry leaders are advocating for regulatory clarity to facilitate the responsible use of European data in AI model training, as outlined in an open letter.17
Until these uncertainties are resolved, not only the adoption of vision-enabled models like Llama 3.2's 11B and 90B in the EU, but more generally the ability of AI models to effectively reflect European context and culture, and the ability of European businesses to use their own data to train and customize open source models, will remain limited.
3.5 Hosting Options
The Llama 3 family provides extensive flexibility in hosting due to its open-source nature, allowing organizations to select the environment that best matches their resources, compliance needs, and application goals. The primary hosting options are as follows:
1. Hosting on Your Own Device
Llama 3.2’s 1B and 3B models are optimized for on-device deployment, suitable for applications on mobile devices and IoT systems that benefit from localized, secure processing. These models can run directly on high-end smartphones (e.g., Samsung S24+, iPhone 15), tablets, or compact devices without external server dependencies. This setup ensures complete control over sensitive data, keeping it on-device and offering an ideal solution for data sovereignty in sectors where data protection is paramount. It is particularly suited for real-time language translation, mobile customer support, and low-latency data retrieval.
2. Hosting on Your Own Servers
For those with dedicated server infrastructure, Llama 3 family models up to 70B and 90B can be deployed in-house.These models generally require high-performance GPUs such as the NVIDIA A100, with recommended specifications including 140 GB of VRAM, 32 GB of system RAM, and at least 1 TB of SSD storage for smooth operation. The 90B model’s vision capabilities make it an optimal choice for tasks involving both text and image inputs, such as AI-powered analytics for customer
engagement and image processing workflows. Hosting in-house offers unmatched control over data security, compliance, and model customization, making it a
preferred choice for sectors like healthcare, finance, and government that demand stringent regulatory alignment and data sovereignty.
3. Cloud or Data Center Hosting
For organizations needing scalable performance, particularly for large-scale models like the 405B model from Llama 3.1, cloud hosting is often the most feasible solution. Services such as AWS, Google Cloud, and Microsoft Azure provide P4d instances with multiple NVIDIA A100 GPUs, offering reliable, high-performance computing without the need for physical infrastructure investment. Cloud hosting enables organizations to meet compliance standards like GDPR and ISO, though it may offer slightly less direct control over data than on-premise options. This approach is ideal for enterprises that require flexibility and high processing power, particularly in sectors like e-commerce and large-scale customer support.18
4. Using API Providers
For organizations aiming to minimize infrastructure management, API providers like Groq, Fireworks, Databricks, and Amazon Bedrock offer on-demand access to Llama models, including the latest 3.2 versions with vision and on-device capabilities. API-based deployments provide a seamless integration path, allowing enterprises to leverage Llama’s advanced features with minimal setup. While API providers can meet compliance needs through features like virtual private cloud (VPC) configurations, self-hosted options typically provide a higher degree of data sovereignty, making them preferable for highly regulated industries. This hosting solution is suitable for dynamic applications, such as real-time customer engagement and scalable content generation, where quick deployment and low maintenance are essential.
3.6 Costs
The open-source nature of the Llama 3 model family offers flexibility in cost management, enabling you to choose a hosting solution that aligns with your budget, technical capabilities, and application requirements.
Self-Hosting on Your Own
For the 1B and 3B models in Llama 3.2, optimized for on-device processing, costs are minimal aside from the initial hardware setup, as these models can run directly on high-end smartphones or IoT devices. This setup is cost-effective and privacy-focused, ideal for applications like real-time translation, mobile customer support, and other localized processing.
Running the 8B model on a local computer equipped with a GPU like the NVIDIA RTX 3000 family incurs only operational costs for electricity and maintenance, provided the necessary hardware is available.
Hosting on Your Own Servers:
For larger models such as the 11B, 70B and 90B models, hosting on company servers offers a long-term, controlled cost structure.
- 11B model with vision capabilities also benefits from local hosting setups for tasks integrating both text and image data processing, where it offers an efficient alternative to the 90B model for multimodal applications.
- 70B and 90B require NVIDIA A100 GPUs, which are priced between $10,000 and $15,000 each. These models are suited for advanced applications in environments where data control and security are critical.
This approach is beneficial for organizations with in-house infrastructure or those in highly regulated industries like healthcare and finance, where full control over data processing is essential.20
Cloud Hosting
For computationally intensive models, especially the 405B model from Llama 3.1, cloud hosting through providers like AWS, Google Cloud, and Microsoft Azure remains the most practical solution. Cloud providers offer instances like AWS P4d with multiple A100 GPUs at approximately $32.80 per hour, which allows for scalable, on-demand usage without physical infrastructure investments. Cloud hosting is ideal for enterprises managing seasonal or fluctuating demands and needing rapid deployment of Llama’s advanced capabilities.21
API Providers:
API providers such as Groq, Fireworks, Databricks, and Amazon Bedrock offer easy access to Llama models,
including 1B, 3B, 8B, 11B, 70B, 90B, and 405B. This option allows organizations to avoid direct hardware and maintenance costs, paying only for token processing. The costs for processing 1 million tokens output (roughly 750 pages of text) vary by model and provider.22 Prices start at:
- 1B model: $0.10 per 1 million tokens.
- 3B model: $0.10 per 1 million tokens.
- 8B model: $0.10 per 1 million tokens.
- 11B model: $0.20 per 1 million tokens due to added vision capabilities.
- 70B model: $0.40 per 1 million tokens.
- 90B model: $0.8 per 1 million tokens for multimodal tasks.
- 405B model: Up to $1.80 per 1 million tokens.
For customer support, these token costs support approximately 2,000 to 3,000 inquiries depending on model size and task complexity, making API-based access an ideal choice for organizations needing scalable, low-maintenance solutions.23
3.7 Hosting Options and Cost Overview for Llama 3 Models
Llama 3’s open-source nature provides extensive hosting flexibility, accommodating various operational needs and infrastructure capacities.
Each hosting option comes with distinct trade-offs in technical requirements, control, scalability, and associated costs.
This overview is designed to aid in making informed decisions aligned with organizational goals and budget constraints.
4. Real-World Applications of
Llama 3.1 & 3.2
4.1 An Overview of Existing and Potential Applications
4.1.2 Anonymous Mental Health Companion:
The Nora AI Solution
In the mental health sector, accessibility and confidentiality are paramount, especially when supporting users seeking private and stigma-free mental health care. Llama 3.2’s 3B model powers Nora, an AI mental health companion designed to provide around-the-clock, empathetic support. This model is lightweight yet capable of processing conversational cues, making it ideal for real-time interactions that feel responsive and human-like. Nora uses Llama’s advanced language capabilities to offer nuanced, contextually aware guidance, which is crucial for supporting users managing stress, anxiety, and emotional well-being.
With the flexibility to run on-device or through a secure cloud setup, Nora ensures that user interactions remain private and anonymous, adhering to stringent privacy standards. For more complex emotional support needs, larger models, such as the 11B or 90B, can be utilized in a hybrid deployment to deliver deeper empathy and emotional responsiveness, scaling resources as required. This adaptability makes Nora a reliable and secure companion for users seeking mental health support in a private, non-judgemental environment.25
4.1.3 Government - Intelligent Citizen Service Assistant
Government agencies often face challenges in providing accessible and inclusive services due to language barriers and the complexity of official documents.
To address these needs, FULLY AI has developed an Intelligent Citizen Service Assistant designed to interpret both textual and visual information, using the InternVL2-Llama3-76B open-source community model.26 Ideally, this use case would employ the Llama 3.2 90B model with its native vision capabilities. However, due to EU regulatory restrictions, Meta’s 90B model with vision cannot yet be deployed in this region.
Thankfully, the open-source nature of Llama fosters a vibrant developer community that continually contributes innovative model adaptations. The InternVL2-Llama3-76B model, developed by OpenGVLab, is a fine-tuned version of an earlier Llama model with integrated vision capabilities. This adaptation allows FULLY AI to implement an assistant capable of interpreting visual data—such as utility bills, ID documents, or other scanned paperwork—extracting essential information, translating content, and providing guidance on government processes.
This community-driven approach allows organizations to deploy advanced, multimodal AI solutions without the additional cost and expertise typically required for extensive fine-tuning. By leveraging models like InternVL2-Llama3-76B, government services can maintain compliance, accessibility, and high functionality while benefiting from the dynamic progress of the open-source ecosystem.
4.1.3 Government - Workflow Automation System
Government agencies often face challenges in managing vast amounts of data and complex processes, leading to delays and increased operational costs. To address these inefficiencies, AI-driven solutions have proven effective in streamlining internal workflows. For instance, the French government’s digital agency, DINUM, has developed AI copilots to assist public agents in automating routine tasks, enhancing data analysis, and improving decision-making. While DINUM’s current implementations do not utilize Llama 3.2, integrating Llama 3.2’s 3B model—or a fine-tuned 1B model for simpler tasks—could further optimize these processes.
-min.jpg)
These models offer cost-effective, resource-efficient solutions suitable for local deployment, focusing on internal operational efficiency rather than citizen-facing applications. By reducing administrative burdens and streamlining workflows, such AI applications enable more effective governance and allow agencies to allocate resources to higher-priority tasks.27
4.1.4 Education - Personalized Learning Platform
In education, providing personalized attention to students is a major challenge. The Personal Tutor solution, using the Llama 3.1 405B model, delivers tailored lessons and real-time feedback, adapting to individual student needs.
This AI-driven tutor significantly improves student engagement and learning outcomes by offering customized support. In trials, educational platforms using Llama 3 saw a marked improvement in student comprehension and retention rates. Hosted via an API, this scalable solution ensures compliance with GDPR and FERPA, supporting large numbers of students simultaneously.28
The matrix provided offers a high-level overview of the requirements, costs, and resources necessary for deploying AI solutions in healthcare, government services, finance and education. This structured approach allows decision-makers to assess which model and hosting options best suit their specific use cases.
Table 4: Comparison of AI-Powered Use Cases
4.2 Enhancing Government Service Accessibility with Open-Source AI: An Application Proposal
4.2.1. Introduction & Context
The digital transformation of public services is a central objective for many governments, often mandated by laws or regulations requiring that all administrative services be accessible online. Government portals serve as primary digital platforms for citizens to access various public services, such as registration and permits. However, the effectiveness of these portals can be limited by their availability in only one language, often with a simplified language option that is utilized by a small percentage of users. This limitation particularly impacts non-native speakers, compelling many to visit physical government offices, which are frequently overwhelmed due to staffing shortages.
The implementation of AI-enabled customer service systems, using open-source AI technologies, aims to address these challenges, improve compliance with digital service mandates, and enhance the overall accessibility and efficiency of public services.
4.2.2. Problem Analysis
The primary challenge faced by users of many government service portals is limited accessibility,
particularly for non-native speakers, elderly individuals, and those with disabilities. The complex navigation and the exclusive use of a single language for both the interface and content present significant barriers. Non-native speakers often experience confusion and frustration as they struggle to find the information they need in a language they understand. Similarly, elderly users, who may be less comfortable with digital interfaces, find it difficult to navigate the site effectively.
These challenges are not confined to these specific groups. Even younger, tech-savvy citizens who are fluent in the platform’s primary language can find the current structure cumbersome and time-consuming. They, too, would benefit from a more streamlined and direct method of accessing information. Implementing an AI chatbot that enables natural conversation in multiple languages offers a solution that addresses the needs of all these groups.
4.2.3. AI Solution Overview
In the ideal scenario, the Intelligent Citizen Service Assistant would utilize the Llama 3.2 90B model’s native vision capabilities to handle both text and visual inputs for seamless government service delivery. However, current EU regulations prevent the deployment of this model within the region, creating a unique challenge for organizations requiring multimodal AI capabilities in a compliant framework.
To overcome this, FULLY AI has adopted a practical alternative: the InternVL2-Llama3-76B model, developed by the open-source community through a fine-tuning approach. Created by OpenGVLab, this model demonstrates the adaptability of open-source solutions by equipping a Llama 3.1-based model with vision capabilities.
This enhancement allows the assistant to analyze and interpret uploaded images, such as scanned official documents, extract relevant text, provide translations, and deliver guidance on navigating government procedures. This approach maintains compliance with GDPR and ISO 27001 while making public services more accessible to diverse populations.
Furthermore, to support robust and accurate responses, the assistant integrates a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) system. This system allows the model to access up-to-date and domain-specific information from external databases, enhancing both the relevance and accuracy of the AI’s responses. The RAG system supplements the Llama model’s capabilities by dynamically retrieving content, allowing for precise answers to queries about complex government policies or document-specific questions.
By leveraging the strengths of the open-source ecosystem, FULLY AI’s assistant provides a scalable, secure, and adaptable solution. It enables government agencies to deploy advanced multimodal AI without incurring additional fine-tuning costs and supports the goal of inclusive, accessible public services while adhering to EU regulatory requirements.
4.2.4. Expected Impact and Value Proposition
Our internal tests with a diverse group of approximately 50 users, ranging from young adults to elderly individuals, yielded overwhelmingly positive feedback. Non-German speakers experienced the most significant improvement, as they were able to access information that was previously unavailable to them. Elderly users also found the AI chatbot particularly helpful; they were more inclined to engage with the system when interacting with a human-like avatar, which made the experience more intuitive and less daunting.
Interestingly, even young, German-speaking users who are familiar with digital interfaces appreciated the AI’s ability to provide quick and direct answers, bypassing the need to navigate through multiple subpages. This feedback reinforces the idea that while the AI solution is crucial for non-German speakers and elderly citizens, it also offers substantial benefits to the broader population by enhancing overall efficiency and user experience.
By making government portals more accessible and efficient, the AI chatbot with vision capabilities has the potential to significantly reduce the number of in-person visits to government offices—offering a solution that aligns with the goals of the OZG. As adoption grows, this tool could ease administrative burdens while improving service delivery for all citizens.
4.2.5 Lessons Learned & Recommendations
Throughout the development process, we faced several challenges, particularly in ensuring compliance and managing hallucinations in the AI’s responses. Compliance with GDPR and ISO 27001 was maintained through careful infrastructure planning and regular audits.
To minimize hallucinations, we implemented a combination of strategies, including a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) system, an exit prompt strategy to guide users to official hotlines when the AI is unsure, and fine-tuning the model with relevant data. These measures proved highly effective, ensuring that the chatbot delivers reliable and trustworthy information.
Our experience demonstrates the importance of taking incremental steps. For other cities or government bodies considering similar initiatives, we recommend starting with a proof of concept that focuses on providing accurate information through an AI-driven system. Once the initial solution is established, additional features, such as appointment scheduling and document assistance, can be added progressively. This approach not only reduces risk but also builds confidence in the technology, setting the stage for broader and more impactful adoption.
4.2.6. Conclusion
The government service case study highlights a significant opportunity to improve the accessibility and efficiency of digital public services through AI. By leveraging the capabilities of the Llama 3.2 models, including their vision capabilities, we have developed a solution that is both compliant with regulatory standards and tailored to meet the diverse needs of the city’s residents. For government officials and decision-makers, the message is clear: embracing AI is not just a technical upgrade, but a vital step toward making public services more inclusive and accessible for all citizens. Starting with an information-based AI system is a feasible and impactful first step, and from there, the possibilities for expanding and enhancing digital services are substantial.
5. How to build a Solution with Llama 3 family - Step by Step
This chapter provides a practical guide for getting started with Llama 3.2. Having explored various use cases, models, and the benefits of open-source AI in previous sections, this guide will now focus on how to effectively plan, deploy, and maintain a Llama 3.2 implementation tailored to your specific needs.
5.1 Strategic Planning and Resource Assessment
The success of any Llama-based implementation starts with a thorough assessment of project requirements, available resources, and performance targets. Before selecting a model, it’s crucial to align the project’s goals with three foundational factors: accuracy, cost, and latency. These elements form a “foundation triangle” that guides model choice, ensuring the AI solution meets operational requirements efficiently.
Key Considerations: Accuracy, Cost, and Latency
Accuracy is often the primary consideration, especially for applications with high-stakes outcomes, such as fraud detection, healthcare compliance, or personalized customer service. Start by setting a clear accuracy benchmark specific to your use case.
For instance, in fraud detection, if each detected fraudulent transaction saves $100 while each missed case incurs a $500 chargeback, the model’s accuracy threshold must be at least 83.3% to maintain profitability.
Higher targets, such as 90%, add a protective margin, enhanciang resilience against financial risks.
For less accuracy-intensive applications, like general customer support, this target can be more flexible, potentially allowing for smaller, faster models.
Accuracy is often the primary consideration, especially for applications with high-stakes outcomes, such as fraud detection, healthcare compliance, or personalized customer service. Start by setting a clear accuracy benchmark specific to your use case. For instance, in fraud detection, if each detected fraudulent transaction saves $100 while each missed case incurs a $500 chargeback, the model’s accuracy threshold must be at least 83.3% to maintain profitability. Higher targets, such as 90%, add a protective margin, enhancing resilience against financial risks. For less accuracy-intensive applications, like general customer support, this target can be more flexible, potentially allowing for smaller, faster models.
Cost management is crucial for aligning AI deployment with budget constraints, particularly in high-traffic applications. Larger models, such as the 405B, generally offer higher accuracy but require substantial infrastructure investment, while smaller models like 1B or 3B are cost-effective and suitable for tasks with less intensive processing needs. For teams with limited budgets, techniques like model distillation allow smaller models to mimic the performance of larger ones, optimizing accuracy within budget.
Latency significantly impacts user experience, especially in real-time or customer-facing applications where response time is critical. Smaller models tend to perform faster due to reduced computational demands, making them ideal for mobile apps or on-device processing. Set a latency threshold based on the use case—real-time applications, such as chatbots or analytics tools, benefit from latency under 100ms, whereas background tasks can accommodate slower processing speeds.
Resource Allocation and Team Composition
Accuracy is often the primary consideration, especially for applications with high-stakes outcomes, such as fraud detection, healthcare compliance, or personalized customer service. Start by setting a clear accuracy benchmark specific to your use case. For instance, in fraud detection, if each detected fraudulent transaction saves $100 while each missed case incurs a $500 chargeback, the model’s accuracy threshold must be at least 83.3% to maintain profitability. Higher targets, such as 90%, add a protective margin, enhanciang resilience against financial risks. For less accuracy-intensive applications, like general customer support, this target can be more flexible, potentially allowing for smaller, faster models.
Budgeting and Timeline
Budgeting should reflect both initial project costs and ongoing operational expenses, including infrastructure, compliance, and team support. Chapter 5 provides a cost matrix to help estimate budgets for specific use cases. Project timelines will vary depending on complexity:
- 3-6 months for simpler use cases like health data anonymization.
- 6-9 months for intermediate cases, such as government workflow automation.
- 9-12 months for complex, high-accuracy applications, like personalized learning platforms.
Each project phase—planning, development, integration, testing, and deployment—will benefit from clear targets for accuracy, cost, and latency, aligning technical execution with strategic objectives
5.2 Selecting the Right
Llama Model
Choosing the appropriate Llama model is essential for achieving an optimal balance of accuracy, cost, and latency, directly affecting your project’s effectiveness and user experience. The Llama 3 family, now expanded with the
Llama 3.2 version and Llama 3.3, provides a range of models tailored to different levels of complexity, resource demands, and performance needs:
- 1B and 3B Models (Llama 3.2): Lightweight, low-latency models suited for real-time, on-device applications, especially where minimal computational resources and high-speed processing are required.
- 8B Model (Llama 3.1): Ideal for tasks with moderate complexity and a need for cost-effective, quick processing, such as internal tools and analytics with low latency requirements.
- 11B Model (Llama 3.2): Multimodal capabilities (text and vision), suitable for document analysis and real-time support involving both image and text inputs.
- 70B Model (Llama 3.3): Optimized for multilingual dialogue, offering balanced performance and enhanced context capabilities. Ideal for customer-facing applications like intelligent chatbots and enterprise workflows,
- 405B Model (Llama 3.1): High accuracy and deep reasoning for complex, high-stakes applications, though it requires significant computational resources and may introduce higher latency.
Practical Decision-Making: Aligning Models with Use Case Requirements
After setting clear targets in Section 6.1, select a model that best meets your established accuracy, cost, and latency benchmarks.
For example:
• High-Accuracy Use Cases: In scenarios where accuracy is essential, such as fraud detection or healthcare applications where errors carry financial or compliance risks, the 70B or 405B models are optimal. These models provide high accuracy and reasoning depth, with the 405B offering the highest precision for critical, high-stakes environments. While these models incur higher costs and latency, the investment is justified by the need for reliable, accurate outcomes.
• Real-Time, Low-Cost, Low-Latency Applications: For applications prioritizing speed and cost-efficiency, such as customer support chatbots or mobile apps for government services, the 3B or 8B models are well-suited. Their lightweight architecture enables faster processing (low latency) at a lower cost, ideal for scenarios where real-time responses are essential and accuracy can be more flexible.
• Multimodal Applications (Text and Vision): Projects requiring both text and image inputs—such as analyzing scanned forms in a citizen service assistant—will benefit from the 11B and 90B models. These models handle multimodal tasks efficiently, balancing moderate accuracy for visual interpretation with manageable latency for timely user interactions. The cost of these models is moderate, suitable for applications needing robust visual and text integration without the full computational load of the 405B.
For simpler, cost-sensitive tasks like internal data retrieval, the 8B model provides the necessary speed and lower operational cost. In contrast, high-engagement applications like an intelligent assistant in the public sector benefit most from the 90B’s vision-enhanced capabilities and contextual accuracy, supporting user satisfaction in visually complex scenarios.
5.3 Defining the Hosting Strategy
After selecting the appropriate model, defining your hosting strategy is required. Llama 3 family offers flexibility with four primary hosting options, each with its own benefits and trade-offs. Refer to chapter 3.6 for detailed cost implications of each option.
Local Hosting: Running the 1B or 3B models on a local machine is the most cost-effective option and offers maximum data control. These lightweight models are optimized for on-device processing and can be hosted on devices with modest hardware requirements, making them ideal for use cases where data security is crucial but computational demands are limited. However, scalability is restricted, and expanding beyond the 11B model would require significant hardware upgrades.
Company Infrastructure: If your organization has robust servers with existing GPUs, hosting the 11B or 90B models internally provides a balance between control and performance. However, acquiring the necessary GPUs, such as the NVIDIA A100, can be costly, with prices ranging from $10,000 to $15,000 per GPU (Chapter 3.6). Additionally, scaling may be challenging if your infrastructure cannot easily accommodate additional resources during peak usage times.
Cloud Hosting: Cloud providers like AWS, GCP, or Azure offer an excellent solution for hosting larger models like the 90B or 405B, with the added benefit of high compliance standards, including GDPR, SOC2, and HIPAA. Cloud hosting provides scalability, allowing you to add more GPU resources as needed. However, this flexibility comes with a continuous cost, as you pay for the infrastructure regardless of usage. While cloud hosting ensures quick scalability, it does not offer the pay-as-you-go efficiency of API providers.
API Providers: For those who prefer not to manage hosting, API providers like GROQ, Fireworks AI, and Amazon Bedrock offer a fully managed solution. These services are particularly advantageous due to their pay-as-you-go model, where you only incur costs during active usage. This approach eliminates concerns about scaling, as the provider handles all infrastructure needs.
Additionally, API providers automatically implement newer
models as they are released, simplifying the upgrade process.
This convenience is particularly valuable for organizations that want to stay up-to-date without the overhead of managing deployments. API providers generally meet compliance standards like GDPR and SOC2, making them suitable for most use cases. However, for organizations requiring ISO 27001 certification, self-hosting or cloud hosting might be preferable.
In summary, your hosting strategy should align with both your compliance needs and your cost structure. For maximum control and data security, local hosting is ideal, while API providers offer unparalleled convenience and scalability.
5.4 Implementation Planning and Fine-Tuning
With the model and hosting strategy in place, the next focus is on implementation. This phase involves integrating the Llama model into your existing business processes and infrastructure, as well as potentially fine-tuning the model to meet your specific needs.
Llama Stack and Environment Configuration: The Llama Stack is a set of tools and frameworks designed to support efficient deployment and management of Llama models across various environments. It includes core components like model-serving frameworks (e.g., ONNX or TensorFlow Serving) for seamless integration and orchestration tools like Kubernetes to automate resource management, especially important for larger models such as the 70B or 405B. To maintain optimal performance, monitoring systems like Prometheus and Grafana are recommended to track usage and response times in real-time. By setting up this stack, organizations ensure flexibility, support iterative improvements, and optimize resource use, aligning both technical and business goals effectively.
Fine-Tuning: Fine-tuning is an optional but powerful process that adapts the model to your unique domain by training it on specific data. This process is similar to training an employee: the model already has a strong foundation, but fine-tuning provides it with the domain-specific knowledge needed to perform at its best. Platforms like Hugging Face and Weights & Biases simplify this process, making it accessible even if you lack deep technical expertise. Fine-tuning can enhance accuracy and reduce the likelihood of hallucination, making it particularly valuable for specialized applications.
Building the Business Application: Beyond the model itself, the core of your AI implementation is the business logic that surrounds it. This includes developing the backend processes that interact with the model, as well as creating the frontend interface, if your application is customer-facing. The frontend should provide an intuitive and responsive user experience, while the backend ensures smooth integration with your existing systems. Tools like LangChain can facilitate integrations with other services, such as databases, Customer Relationship Management (CRM) systems, and internal document repositories, enabling seamless interaction between your AI model and the broader application.
Front-End Considerations: Depending on whether your application is customer-facing or internal, front-end design priorities will differ. For customer-facing use cases, the focus should be on creating an engaging and intuitive interface that offers a strong human-AI interaction. This might involve integrating the AI model into multi-channel environments such as web platforms, mobile apps, or messaging systems, and incorporating human-like avatars to enhance user experience. For internal applications, the emphasis should be on functionality and efficiency, ensuring that the interface supports streamlined workflows and quick, accurate decision-making.
-min.jpg)
5.5 Quality Assurance
and Testing
Quality assurance (QA) is a key consideration when deploying Llama, particularly given the autonomous nature of LLMs. Ensuring that the model generates accurate and reliable information is crucial for maintaining trust and effectiveness.
Mitigating Hallucination with a RAG System
One of the primary challenges with large language models is hallucination, where the model produces incorrect or fabricated information. To mitigate this, implementing a RAG system is recommended. A RAG system enhances the reliability of the model by allowing it to reference accurate,
Establishing Guardrails
Setting up system prompts and guardrails is essential for controlling the behavior of the model. These guardrails act as boundaries, guiding the model’s interactions and preventing it from veering into off-topic or inappropriate areas. For example, you can establish prompts that instruct the model to avoid discussing competitors or sensitive topics, ensuring that it remains focused on the intended use case and operates within safe, predefined parameters.
Handling Personal Identifiable Information (PII)
When dealing with sensitive data, particularly in customer-facing applications, protecting PII is crucial. Implementing a PII Anonymizer ensures that any sensitive data processed by the model is anonymized before being sent through external systems and de-anonymized when received. This process helps maintain compliance with privacy regulations like GDPR and prevents the unintended exposure of personal data.
Periodic Testing of AI Agents
To maintain the ongoing reliability and performance of your Llama implementation, periodic testing of AI agents is recommended. Regular testing helps identify and resolve any emerging issues, such as performance degradation, security vulnerabilities, or changes in user interaction patterns. By conducting these tests at scheduled intervals, you ensure that the model continues to meet quality standards and operates securely in all scenarios.
5.6 Deployment and Scaling
Deployment marks the transition from development to production. Your deployment strategy will vary depending on the hosting option selected. API providers handle scaling automatically, making them the simplest choice for many users. However, if you are hosting on your own infrastructure or using cloud services, you will need to ensure that your systems can scale in response to varying demand.
Cloud hosting offers quick scalability but comes with continuous costs, as you are billed regardless of usage. Local and company infrastructure, while offering more control, may struggle with rapid scaling, particularly during peak times. Conversely, API providers offer a highly scalable, cost-efficient solution, where you only pay for what you use, eliminating concerns about underutilized resources.
5.7 Ongoing
Maintenance and Continuous Improvement
Maintaining and improving your Llama implementation is an ongoing process. Regular monitoring and performance tracking are essential for identifying areas where the model may need refinement or additional training. By analyzing user interactions and model outputs, you can gather insights that inform future updates and fine-tuning efforts.
Accuracy and Relevance of Responses should be continuously monitored to ensure that the AI is providing contextually appropriate and reliable information. While the desired level of accuracy can vary depending on the use case, aiming for a response accuracy rate around 95% is often a good benchmark. However, this may be adjusted based on the criticality and sensitivity of the application.29
User Satisfaction and Feedback are key indicators of how well the AI is meeting the expectations of its users, particularly in customer-facing applications. For many use cases, maintaining a satisfaction rate above 85% serves as a solid indicator of success. Nevertheless, this value should be tailored to reflect the specific user base and interaction context.30
Operational Efficiency and Cost Savings are particularly relevant for internal applications. Tracking improvements in task completion times or operational costs can provide tangible evidence of the AI solution’s impact. The actual target should be determined based on the specific objectives and operational needs of the organization.31
If you have chosen to host the model on your own infrastructure, it is important to plan for periodic updates. Unlike API providers, which automatically update to newer model versions, self-hosting requires you to manage and deploy updates manually.
This process involves downloading the latest model versions, testing them, and ensuring they integrate smoothly with your existing setup. Regular updates to both the model and the underlying data are essential to ensure continued relevance and accuracy. Additionally, ongoing analysis helps identify gaps in the model’s knowledge or areas where performance could be improved, allowing for continuous optimization.
-min.jpg)
6. Practical Checklist for Implementation
01. Define Your Use Case
- Clearly identify the problem or opportunity your AI solution will address.
- Determine the specific tasks or processes you want the AI to improve or automate.
06. Consider External Partners
- Explore collaboration with an external partner like FULLY AI to simplify implementation, reduce risks, and leverage expertise in model selection, hosting, and compliance management.
02. Assess Strategic Goals and Compliance Requirements
- Align your AI project with your organization’s strategic objectives.
- Review relevant regulations and compliance needs (e.g., GDPR, ISO 27001).
07.Fine-Tuning and Customization
- Plan for model fine-tuning using your domain-specific data to improve accuracy and relevance.
- Leverage available platforms like Hugging Face or Weights & Biases for easy customization.
03. Select the Appropriate Llama Model
- Choose between Llama 3.2 1B, 3B 11B, 90B, Llama 3.3 70B or Llama 3.1 405B models based on your use case complexity and performance requirements
- Consider factors such as accuracy, reasoning capabilities, and multilingual support.
08. Develop and Integrate Business Applications
- Design and develop the necessary backend and frontend infrastructure.
- Ensure seamless integration with existing systems and databases.
04. Plan Your Budget and Resources
- Estimate costs for initial development, hosting, and ongoing operations.
- Assess the internal and external human resources needed, including AI/ML engineers, data scientists, and compliance officers.
09. Implement Quality Assurance and Testing
- Set up a robust QA process, including input/output validation, guardrails, and PII protection.
- Regularly test the AI system to identify and mitigate hallucinations or errors.
05. Choose the Right Hosting Strategy
- Evaluate hosting options: local device, company servers, cloud hosting, or API providers.
- Factor in data security, scalability, and operational costs.
10. Deploy and Monitor
- Deploy the AI solution in your chosen environment and monitor performance.
- Establish KPIs to track user satisfaction, operational efficiency, and accuracy.
11. Plan for Continuous Improvement
- Set up a process for regular updates, model retraining, and fine-tuning based on real-world usage.
- Gather user feedback and performance data to guide ongoing improvements.
8. Conclusion
This guide has outlined a detailed framework for developing AI-driven services using open-source technologies, with particular attention to the Llama 3.2 model and its variants within the Llama family. By covering key processes—from strategic planning and model selection to deployment and continuous improvement—we’ve illustrated how organizations can maximize the potential of open-source AI in creating effective, citizen-centric service platforms.
While the citizen service case study highlights the transformative power of Llama 3.2 for public sector applications, this guide aims to empower decision-makers, developers, and AI innovators to apply similar principles across diverse sectors. By adhering to this structured methodology, organizations can confidently ensure that their AI solutions align with critical compliance standards such as GDPR, ISO 27001, and any other industry-specific requirements, all while being finely tuned to user needs.
The approach outlined here underscores the importance of comprehensive planning, thoughtful model selection, appropriate hosting strategies, and continuous performance optimization.
This framework applies not only to government contexts but also to any organization aiming to leverage AI for enhanced efficiency, accessibility, and user engagement.
As the field of AI continues to advance, the principles in this guide serve as a foundation for innovation. By embracing open-source models like those in the Llama 3 family, organizations benefit from flexibility, an active community, and cost-efficiency, ultimately contributing to the future of compliant, user-focused AI-driven services.
In conclusion, whether your objective is to develop a public service platform, enhance customer support, or explore new AI applications, the roadmap provided here offers a trusted pathway to successful AI implementation. Open-source models like Llama present a promising future for AI in service delivery, and with this approach, your organization can lead in this transformative journey.
Acknowledgments
I would like to extend my sincere thanks to Stefan Meister and Stepan Soukenik, as well as the entire Meta Policy team, for their excellent collaboration on this guide and the project. Your dedication and support have been invaluable. I would also like to express my special gratitude to Matthias Lau for his meticulous proofreading and insightful feedback. Additionally, I am deeply grateful to Janine Reimann and Till Lojewsky for their outstanding support in various ways, including helping with the structure, project management, and research. Thank you all for your contributions.
Source Directory
Amazon Web Services. (n.d.-a). Announcing the new Amazon EC2 P4d Instances. Amazon Web Services, Inc. Retrieved at 15. August 2024, from https://aws.amazon.com/ec2/instance-types/p4/
Artificial Analysis. (n.d.). Model & API Provider Analysis. Retrieved at 06. December 2024, from
https://artificialanalysis.ai/
Cirou, É. (2024, 6. Mai). Say hello to Albert! The new AI in French public services. Blog Economie Numérique.
https://blog.economie-numerique.net/2024/05/06/say-hello-to-albert-the-new-ai-in-french-public-service/
de Vries, A. (2023, October 18). The growing energy footprint of artificial intelligence. Joule, 7(10), 2191-2194. Retrieved December 11, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2023.10.005
euneedsai.com. (2024). Europe needs regulatory certainty on AI. Retrieved November 12, 2024, from https://euneedsai.com
Eggers, W. D., Schatsky, D. & Viechnicki, P. (2017, 26. April). AI-augmented government. Deloitte Insights. Retrieved at 19. July 2024, from https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/focus/cognitive-technologies/artificial-intelligence-government.html
Federal Ministry of the Interior and Community. (n.d.). What is the Online Access Act? The Online
Access Act. https://www.digitale-verwaltung.de/Webs/DV/EN/ozg/ozg-node.html
Groq. (n.d.). Why Groq: The Shift to AI Inference. Groq. Retrieved at 20. August 2024, from https://wow.groq.com/why-groq/
IBM. (n.d.). What are Large Language Models (LLMs)? Retrieved at 15. August 2024, from https://www.ibm.com/topics/large-language-models
Klarna Bank AB. (2024, 27. February). Klarna AI assistant handles two-thirds of customer service chats in its first month. Klarna. Retrieved at 19. July 2024, from https://www.klarna.com/international/press/klarna-ai-assistant-handles-two-thirds-of-customer-service-chats-in-its-first-month/
Krishnan, R. R. (2024, 25. April). Llama 3: As your Financial Advisor. Medium. Retrieved at 19. July 2024, from https://medium.com/@renjuhere/llama-3-as-your-financial-advisor-8904a2673f2c
Meta. (n.d.-a). Meet Llama 3.1. Retrieved at 15.August 2024, from https://llama.meta.com/
Meta. (n.d.-b). AI at Meta: Building AI experiences for everyone. Retrieved at 20. August 2024, from
https://ai.meta.com
Meta. (n.d.-c). Welcome to our community. Meta Open Source. Retrieved at 15. August 2024, from https://opensource.fb.com/
Meta (n.d.-d). Llama Community Support. Retrieved at 11. November 2024, from https://www.llama.com/docs/community-support-and-resources/
Meta (n.d.-e). Llama 3.2 Acceptable Use Policy. Retrieved at 11. November 2024, from https://www.llama.com/llama3_2/use-policy/
Meta. (n.d. -f). Deploying Llama 3.2 1B/3B: Partner Guides. Retrieved November 12, 2024, from https://llama.com/docs/getting-the-models/1b3b-partners/
Meta. (n.d. -g). Deploying Llama 3.1 405B: Partner Guides. Retrieved November 12, 2024, from https://llama.com/docs/getting-the-models/405b-partners/
Meta. (n.d. -h). Llama Guard 3 Customization: Taxonomy Customization, Zero/Few-shot Prompting, Evaluation, and Fine Tuning. Meta-Llama Recipes GitHub Repository.
https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-recipes
Meta. (2024a, Juli 23). Introducing Llama 3.1: Our most capable models to date. Retrieved at 15.August 2024, from https://ai.meta.com/blog/meta-llama-3-1/
Meta. (2024b, 7. May). How Companies Are Using Meta Llama. Retrieved at 19. July 2024, from https://about.fb.com/news/2024/05/how-companies-are-using-meta-llama/
Meta. (2024d, October 24). Introducing quantized Llama models with increased speed and a reduced memory footprint. Retrieved November 12, 2024, from https://ai.meta.com/blog/meta-llama-quantized-lightweight-models/
Microsoft. (2023, 27. September). How to Evaluate LLMs: A Complete Metric Framework - Microsoft Research. Microsoft Research. Retrieved at 20. August 2024, from
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/group/experimentation-platform-exp/articles/how-to-evaluuate-llms-a-complete-metric-framework/
Milberg, T. (2024, 28. April). The future of learning: AI is revolutionizing education 4.0. World
Economic Forum. Retrieved at 20. August 2024, from
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2024/04/future-learning-ai-revolutionizing-education-4-0/
Neuralmagic. (n.d.). neuralmagic/Meta-Llama-3.1-405B-Instruct-FP8. Hugging Face.
Retrieved at 15. August 2024, from
https://huggingface.co/neuralmagic/Meta-Llama-3.1-405B-Instruct-FP8
Nextpeer. (2024, October 25). How Nextpeer Built Nora: An AI Mental Health Companion on Llama 3.2. Nextpeer. Retrieved from https://nextpeer.co/post/nora-built-on-llama
NVIDIA. (n.d.). Llama-3.1-Nemotron-70B-Instruct. Retrieved November 12, 2024, from https://build.nvidia.com/nvidia/llama-3_1-nemotron-70b-instruct
Nucci, A. (n.d.). LLM Evaluation: Key Metrics and Best Practices. AISERA. Retrieved at 20. August
2024, from https://aisera.com/blog/llm-evaluation/
Retrieved November 13, 2024, from https://huggingface.co/OpenGVLab/InternVL2-Llama3-76B
OpenGVLab. (n.d.). InternVL2-Llama3-76B. Hugging Face. Retrieved November 13, 2024, from https://huggingface.co/OpenGVLab/InternVL2-Llama3-76B
OWASP. "AI Security Solutions Landscape." T10 for Gen AI - Solution Landscape. OWASP, 2024. Accessed 12 Nov. 2024. genai.owasp.org/ai-security-solutions-landscape
Run:ai. (n.d.). AWS GPU: Best GPU Instances and How to Optimize Your Costs. Run:Ai. Retrieved at 20. August 2024, from https://www.run.ai/guides/cloud-deep-learning/aws-gpu
Samsi, S., Zhao, D., McDonald, J., Li, B., Michaelas, A., Jones, M., Bergeron, W., Kepner, J., Tiwari, D., & Gadepally, V. (2023). From Words to Watts: Benchmarking the Energy Costs of Large Language Model Inference. Retrieved at 11. November 2024, from https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.03003
Savarese, S. (2024, 28. Juni). First-Of-Its-Kind LLM Benchmark ranks generative AI against Real-World business tasks. Salesforce. Retrieved at 20. August 2024, from https://www.salesforce.com/blog/llm-benchmark/
Shah, A. & Chockalingam, A. (2024, 8. August). Supercharging Llama 3.1 across NVIDIA Platforms.
NVIDIA Technical Blog. Retrieved at 15. August 2024, from
https://developer.nvidia.com/blog/supercharging-llama-3-1-across-nvidia-platforms/
weizhiwang. (n.d.). weizhiwang/Video-Language-Model-Llama-3.1-8B. Hugging Face. Retrieved at 15. August 2024, from https://huggingface.co/weizhiwang/Video-Language-Model-Llama-3.1-8B
Wiest, I. C., Leßmann, M., Wolf, F., Ferber, D., Van Treeck, M., Zhu, J., Ebert, M. P., Westphalen, C.B., Wermke, M. & Kather, J. N. (2024). Anonymizing medical documents with local, privacy preserving large language models: The LLM-Anonymizer. medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory). https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.11.24308355